No. 20-6761
Wayne Wells, Jr. v. Terrie Wallace, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: age-of-consent civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process evidence-rules sentencing statutory-interpretation trial-procedure witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does Module Code Ann. § 16-3-1055 (B)(c) has a constitutional requirement that a trial court must rule on the defendant's motion to suppress evidence before proceeding to trial, and if so, does the trial answer to the question whether the trial court's failure to rule on the motion to suppress evidence as a confirmed defense, entitles the defendant to a mistrial or a confirmed defense?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the statute SC Code Ann. 8 10-3655 (8)(2) have unconstitutional requirements?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent Wallace, Warden to respond filed.
2020-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Wallace, Warden
Melody Jane Brown — South Carolina Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Wayne Wells, Jr.
Wayne Wells Jr. — Petitioner