No. 20-6744

Sinclair Ellis, Jr. v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

Where as the District Court has 30 days on the Speedy Trial Clock to make a ruling on a pre-trial motion under §3161 (H)(l)(J). If the Distrcit Court take 90 days (without an,ends-of-Justice ruling on the record) to make a ruling on a Pre-Trial motion, is 60 days of the 90 days counted by the Speedy Trial Clock?

Where as if. the Speedy Trial 70 day time limit is in Question (under §3161(c)(l)) before the Petitioner enter a guilty plea,is the petitioner counsel held accountable for allowing 139 days to surpass the.Speedy Trial Act Limitation.

Where as did the District Court error by not granting the Petitioner an C.O.A. when the Petitioner Speedy Trial rights was in Question?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Sinclair Ellis
Sinclair Ellis — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent