No. 20-6739
Larun E. Miller v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights due-process federal-criminal-procedure jurisdictional-challenge outrageous-government-conduct sixth-circuit-conflict standing statutory-interpretation vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in their refusal/failure to address the conflict amongst the courts, while not acknowledging a persuasive split amongst the circuits regarding the Sixth Circuit's refusal to adopt or recognize the availability of the outrageous government conduct defense and whether the due process clause creates a conflict that this Court has previously addressed
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Larun E. Miller
Larun E. Miller — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent