1. Whether the Court of Appeals' failure to remedy the District Court's improper venue selection conflicts with this Court's decisions in Nichols v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1113 (2016) and Carr v. United States, 560 U.S. 438 (2010), and decisions of other circuits, warranting an exercise of this Court's supervisory power.

2. Whether the Court of Appeals' decision denying Petitioner his right to attack his prior conviction necessary for a SORNA violation conflicts with this Court's authority in Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485 (1994), and is an important federal question calling for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power.

3. Whether SORNA violates the Constitution as its laws are punitive and whether contesting precedent that hold s otherwise should be permitted when that precedent runs afoul of the Constitution.

whether-the-court-of-appeals'-failure-to-remedy-the-district-court's-improper-venue-selection