No. 20-6723
Akando Ducksworth v. Hal MacMurdo, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-review civil-procedure civil-rights correctional-institute due-process medical-care prisoner-rights standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Petitioner's case should have proceeded past the dismissal phase based on the merits of his claim.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Petitioner's case should have proceeded past the dismissal phase based on the merits of his claim
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-25
Waiver of right of respondent Hal MacMurdo, et al. to respond filed.
2020-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Akando Ducksworth
Akando Ducksworth — Petitioner
Hal MacMurdo, et al.
Andrew Blanchfield — Keogh, Cox & Wilson, Ltd., Respondent