If the government refused to dispute the factual manifestations of the I.
Petitioner's government breach daim because clause three of the plea
contract holds it accountable for any imprerisions in the statement of
facts may the Fourth Circuit affirm the Rule II court's conjecture that
the Petitioner conceded that paragraph four remained intact where
the record is silent as to such concession due to said court's ambiguous
question?

II. Whether the Petitioner satisfied the prejudice prong under Hill v. Lockhart,
474 US 52 (1985)?

Whether the government's failure to dispute the factual manifestations of the Petitioner's government breach claim due to the plea contract's accountability clause precludes the Fourth Circuit from affirming the district court's conjecture that the Petitioner conceded paragraph four remained intact