Whether The court of Appeals erred and abused its discretion For Forfeiting The challenge The indictment and argue For dismissal For lack of subject matter jurisdiction Where evidence exist That the Honorable day wells state court had Full jurisdiction over Appellant's Case when The Government Filed the Federal indictment on December 13, 2017. Appellant was present and examined before a magistrate judge without unnecessary delay. No federal indictment tag was issued. Conceivably, there wasn't any ongoing investigation For Appellant's case? Appellant wasn't convicted in the State case for related Charges. The government stranded Appellant in the Federal court without the State judge Relinquish Senicide jurisdiction.

Whether The Appeals court erred and abused its discretion in dismissing Appellant's arguments That The prosecutor Violated his Constitutional Duties to Disclosure by withholding Favorable evidence From The defense, causing prejudice? Reasonable jurors could Find The Appeals court assessment of Appellant's constitutional claims debatable.

Whether The court of Appeals erred and abused discretion in denying Appellant's arguments without addressing all The evidence and arguments on Their merits?

Whether the court of appeals erred and abused its discretion in rejecting the challenge to the indictment and argument for dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction