No. 20-6681
Robert Wright v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-exhaustion administrative-remedies civil-procedure civil-rights due-process exhaustion-requirement prison-grievance prisoner-litigation pro-se-litigation procedural-default standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
1 Was Wright required to exhaust state remedies even if the DOJ POOS was a dead end?
2. Because the full grievance process was not in place before the defense rested, should administrative exhaustion be required, and if so, did the purpose of exhaustion fail because Wright improperly filed before exhausting, and even if he did, did it provide him a sufficient opportunity to exhaust?
3. Did the district court fail to determine what of the stonewalled Goesation if Delusures was tried?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Wright required to exhaust state remedies under the PLRA?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-20
Waiver of right of respondents Georgia Department of Corrections, et al. to respond filed.
2020-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.
Andrew Alan Pinson — Office of the Georgia Attorney General, Respondent
Robert Wright
Robert Wright — Petitioner