1. Petitioner's Constitutional rights have been violated by the Appellate Court denying Petitioner due process of law, as provided under The Constitution of the United States, Amendment V, See page 6(1).

2. Petitioner's Constitutional rights have been violated by the Appellate Court not addressing Petitioner's specific grievances, as provide under The Constitution of the United States, Amendment I, See page 7(2-4).

3. Petitioner has a Constitutional right to stand on Federal Statutes and the lower Courts have violated Petitioner's due process by not ruhng on the Federal Statutes presented, instead they claim they have no Jurisdiction, See page 7.

4. Both the Claims Court and Appellate Court has Jurisdiction to rule on Federal Statutes, but both have denied Petitioner due process of law by denying Petitioner the protection provided in Title 26 U-S.C. §§6212 and 6213(a), See page 7.

5. Both the Claims Court and the Appellate Court are Mandated to follow the rules in Federal Statutes, but both have denied Petitioner due process of law by not adhering to or following the Mandates in Title 26 U.S.C. §§6212 and 6213(a).

6. The Appellate Court has violated Petitioners due process by claiming they have NO Jurisdiction in Petitioner's case, then proceed unlawfully to rule against Petitioner. The courts website, says they do have Jurisdiction, See Appendix B

7. Petitioner's due process rights were violated, bv the Respondents own admission. they DID NOT SEND a Mandated lawful assessment, better known as 26 U.S.C. §§6212 "Notice of Deficiency " and 6213(a), "Notice of Determination " to Petitioner, See Addendum E.

Has the petitioner's constitutional rights been violated by the appellate court's denial of due process?