No. 20-6668
Christopher Zamarripa v. United States
Tags: ambiguity appeal-waiver circuit-split criminal-procedure district-court due-process judicial-interpretation plea-bargaining plea-colloquy procedural-ambiguity
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a district court's mischaracterization, during the plea colloquy, of an appeal waiver create an ambiguity that must be construed against the government and render a broader appeal waiver unknowing and involuntary?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a district court's mischaracterization, during the plea colloquy, of an appeal waiver create an ambiguity that must be construed against the government and render a broader appeal waiver unknowing and involuntary?
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-05
Reply of petitioner Christopher Zamarripa filed.
2021-03-19
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2021-02-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 19, 2021.
2021-02-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 19, 2021 to March 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 19, 2021.
2021-01-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 20, 2021 to February 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Christopher Zamarripa
Kristin Michelle Kimmelman — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent