No. 20-6642

Kevin W. Dunigan v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-17
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process sovereign-immunity standing takings
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

Should all of plain' ewwil and punidne comp4nsatone be atbibuted ty Kevin \el Oungan
it. Tohovah, Ratag Javytah while all equa sted
atto/nay's fxs fur Or ce paint ihcompasims 33.5% of' all civil compenrations with
a 3S multoler be attributed to Kevin
oyna Phillips Sra Mt Elohim Yohvuth Chmst 7

6 Alco should all MAavtsted ha bLas cohpusr
type aM £e Statutory atte May \F four aly bk
attributed to Kewa Wayne Phcllips Sy tu Mn

—Clahin Yahweh Christ, Lncom passing all fe
| gucsted multig herr Artwoith standing all —
Sovereign patholosistr, DNA 2xperty Health
Cane Profe svi Maly woth their [Stack SOG A
Aruake Lar TG Oba rp including plaint Fhe'
technologically rauy invertigatwr Ham's
fees and all mautrted mult' pliers q

© Should all of planter' dual soverrign nctial
taxes and church tither be paid into there
respecte coulkers ?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should all of plaintiff's civil and punitive compensations be attributed to Kevin Wayne Phillips vs. Jehovah, Yahweh Christ?

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Kevin W. Dunigan
Kevin W. Dunigan — Petitioner