1. Should Citizens Business Banking consider the protection of its customers '
money and line of credit as one of its essential responsibilities?

2. When the bank is notified that a school 's operations are undermined by
sabotage, fraudulence, conspiracy, and contentious and complicated legal
battles, should the bank strive to prevent procedural abuses that would
exacerbate harm towards schools as educational institution and business?

3. Should Citizens Business Banking implement safeguards to prevent the
acceptance of inadequately approved documentation or unauthorized money
transfers - especially when concerns of institutional sabotage have been
presented?

4. How does Citizens Bank protect their clients ' privacy and attain their clients '
authorization for any release of money or credit line when it neglects to
contact its clients of significant money transfers or changes?

5. When Citizens Business Banking claims that money is "automatically and
electronically transferred, " does this imply that no one at Citizens Bank
facilitates transfers, or checks the validity of a transfer?

6. Is the Respondent 's use of the phrase "automatically and electronically
transferred " a means of covering up the person that approved the
unauthorized transfer?

7. Should Citizens Business Banking implement policies and consequences that
would discourage such harmful actions towards its integrity and federal law?

Should Citizens Business Banking consider the protection of its customers' money and line of credit as one of its essential responsibilities?