Wktikar or got e latk) o courts *UM 17¢ 5ftvid ;101WA -crow iikip5114 avvi pro-i-gtkivi 4'1Q unctibiitu hand i wtpositiovi aid. ethei aloso (de. staiite. dots ourtmtedie.. add '61/1 tyf CEAS5 LI lwfavvous exitue ak.savitotecti, atiA twit-Am-tic cilium to_ t cult& all), cavet-Fibv\ .59,vitcpicks. or %IA .1•14L vrocautal d&tivdk ar catiiIcala of appialabilil (Coil) sliovaci astel sivoT4 ilstruci t viAitAia9 in tarititts or -Ng. o 00,1 p.06911\61 relreiltss oftit-fact.

E. \kik bc ,cuytttetwigo-tal wiistarriago_ u_skiizt aducti iumot,0144, tottot cuad pivluditz, lack ok 5060 wtaffer joriclictiovi, error of coo.thiltiflotia.1 wta cps ag, sAtAicitat4 ttia9e. IkalAE law, and/or dis tb yard wttlitria.1 fad ivtappiltait to exam, proteduirailltittifailvd-l-ed dativik 4-o _sit44,144 . bl)situitk Attie a vidawliarti huirivf or 414c offittat f ro ctedavil rtojetrobt65 tk-114 attd.

Whether the lower courts should be sanctioned for protecting the unconstitutional imposition of void and obsolete statute