XM F* F) P-ec'-erpyi Hcdagcxs Corpus
For criMtNPd os^ej^cftNfS irJ c-hevieNQiNc.
tVie V€-GrR-'-\FY OF ThOT CONiFlNx2»Ae.MF
WeFoce -fir^r st^TS *fTfAl£ F>Ffer pcbovn^g
o^d /(i®-^sswrt>N<0 lots Stecte reMed.-es v^iere
e*hAvjs-»-ed ) should The U-S- b IS TCI Of
Cour^ ^pp w a& USC 225H or OP. use
22HI. AS 22m 1*5 - N'O T 3=> ^uWA-ecV
"to TV>e r£STr\c+icf\s OF Tt\s A-'ET'D'-D,A'
of 2^V>SC 22.SM. ANt> SINCC 22-41 iS
liKCAY^A COH+'riUOJL? pCe-TAAl OOOF.rstlAS.NX-t-')
VS, Ft S^ect "lO beiM^ Dsn^ed ujirV,
pr<^\vjdiee or success we, va>Vvc>> peJtA-Hc/ner
peek's tfivy vF sKovj'd nox 'o-e v^ecAuse
-there cxr«T uum We. eowFiAued^ P-ut'tYcjS
\k\ h'S s+ode. proceecH'tscjS ■+Fax_sv>ovjvd
AMcxu V»\M To V^e. cAXouaed TO \~i\e o. 2md
cT 3rd ,efrc- HovdeoS, .

2,\ \T \S obviov/S TbAT
c^vV-s eKteclcJ-ed CoilMexod estoppel (gth
Avwdv.er>+)tr a co^mz-oOoie Hodeas
cl aim . vtouoevef TFere Are (23 tA/MXor
OW\ted STo.-fes' Supreme Court- cAses
[sto oc/e Per j f (t)She vS^^Sc^i ) m coMT^ovexey
tV,er Weeds resolu-HoH. ThANK-'Tov,
(ftlM«d to t iH corvrfovefy ^ estepel socw»«e^1.
oble XJSQpcxedY {>S

Whether federal habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is available to criminal defendants challenging the legality of their confinement before exhausting state remedies