Is the intent of FERPA to protect the privacy of student and faculty as a preliminary subsociety, not use 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(a)(4)(B)(i&ii) in a punitive manner to exclude discloser of evidence on student as a means towards censorship?

If college hearings rises to the level of capricious by the courts for review, should Discovery Rule 29 and those evident material facts be relevant towards Due Process in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution?

Is the intent of FERPA to protect the privacy of student and faculty as a preliminary subsociety, not use 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(a)(4)(B)G&ii) in a punitive manner to exclude discloser of evidence on student as a means towards censorship?