I. Can Congress Statutorily limit the Subject-matter Jurisdiction of Courts Created by Act of Congress?

II. Is there a limitation of time based on procedural hurdles (i.e. 2255, 2241, Appeal, etc., and terror limitations by motion)?

III. If Congress Uses a Specific word with a specific meaning, (i.e. Sentence), does Due Process and Fair Notice allow for the Judicial to give these definitive term other meanings?

IV. If 28:2255 limit the available remedies of the Petitioner to request and these remedies are plainly written set aside vacate, Correct the sentence), where in the statutory language does it authorize any Petitioner, in the tent, to move any Court to set asides vacat, or Correct any Conviction?

V. If 28:2255 clearly and on ambiguity limits any Petitioners movable remedies to setaside, vocate, or correct his sentence, is 28:2255's Statutory text ineffective and or inadequate to move the Court to relieve a conviction when 2255 and clearly has no such remedy available to request?

VI. What part of 2255(a) changes a sentence Challenge for any other Challenge?

Can Congas Stabasly lowt by teak the Subject matter Tycho of Coors Cleated by ar het of acres 7 j