A district court's guidelines calculatio ns are reviewed for clear
error. Did the court of appeals err in holding that the district court's
guidelines calculatio ns did not constitute clear error where it
denied a mitigating role adjustme nt to a consp irator wh o engaged
in a limited number of transaction s involvi ng stree t-level quantiti es
of metham phetam ine?

Whether the district court's denial of a mitigating role adjustment was clear error