No. 20-6580

Joseph W. Peeples, III v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arrest civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure detention due-process evidence-admissibility fourth-amendment search-and-seizure travel warrantless-search
Latest Conference: 2021-01-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does the long standing commitment on U.S. Constitution Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment to right with Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 3, 5, 5.1, 7, and Fla. Stat. § 925.11 require that within a crime petitioner with wreck of a witness's statement, 71, allow study of any subpoenas upon appeal, 1. Petitioner denied of range, item "exs" 1 page of arrest, ascend back to charged, D, states' judgment, union oath, contract with a lawsee of court in hers hereby on use cases innocent 3, 1. contract, 2, 1. with Xmcu, only 1 5. required a, uneven vague 7d st zue similar, 15 a, 1t5 justice.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, along with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, allow any person suspected of a crime to freely travel in America and be arrested outside of a designated area, remove any summons, warrant, or subpoena, and detain the person against their will without due process

Docket Entries

2021-08-02
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-02-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-01-25
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Joseph W. Peeples
Joseph W. Peeples III — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent