No. 20-6578

Rickey White v. Gary L. Lumpkin, Presiding Judge, Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-15
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

I

INNAGIE SEAFCH WARRAT

Q2

DEFECTIVE WALRHNT AFFIDAVI'T

RREST MAERANT TOR FOPAELE CAUSE.

N

TUERE WAS N SUFPORTING AFFIDAUE

RESENGEd TO A JUCGE tO SToUl OTATLE CAUJE

IN Fis CASE.

T0

THE LI.S, COUT OF AFFEALS BEFOSE

to Show

AlFONEd PETITONER CRAL ARGUNENT

FRODAPLE CAUSE did N EiTE tHF

STATE

COURT AIOW A INALIC NARAN o BE

ACCE

PReHTiONER

GUiRTy oN

To FOuNd

INFERMAHION WEN thE

DEFECTUE

WIRRANT

Shou INAUFFICIENT

INFORIUATION SLOUd HAS

QFFiCE

BEEN

SUREO by the

ThE

STAITE COURTO.

TAHEING HE AFFIDAUT DIGNOT SWEAR UNDER OATH

OFFU

DELIbERATE DUDIFFE

IN THE AFFDAUT iS INAUFFICIENTY

CAN NOK BE USFEC

ERROR FOR NOT SURTRESS HEE

ThE

TRIAL COURT

IN HHE AFFFDAUIT.

CRF-1981-83. thERE iS NoT

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2021-01-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Rickey White
Rickey White — Petitioner