No. 20-6569
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review felon-in-possession judicial-proceedings jury-instructions mens-rea plain-error rehaif-v-united-states second-circuit trial-record
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should the Court of Appeals have looked beyond the trial record to Frye's presentence investigation report to decide that there was no plain error that seriously affected the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the Court of Appeals have looked beyond the trial record to Frye's presentence investigation report to decide that there was no plain error that seriously affected the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings?
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-02-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
2021-02-08
Reply of petitioner Quincey Frye filed.
2021-02-05
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2020-12-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 8, 2021.
2020-12-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 7, 2021 to February 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 7, 2021)
Attorneys
Quincey Frye
Martin John Vogelbaum — Federal Public Defender's Office - WDNY, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent