No. 20-6558

Sonya Bamberg v. Georgia

Lower Court: Georgia
Docketed: 2020-12-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-suppression habeas-corpus judicial-procedure post-conviction-proceedings right-to-appeal right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

Sonya Bamberg was denied due process because she was denied a full and complete record to review for appeal. Bamberg was denied meaningful review of her conviction due to the lack of transcript of the first day of trial. The question to be answered is whether a judge who did not preside over the trial may certify a supplemental record of testimony from witnesses eight years after conviction where the defendant is no longer represented by trial counsel and the prosecutor was totally replaced.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a judge who did not preside over the trial may certify a supplemental record of testimony from witnesses eight years after a conviction when the defendant is no longer represented by trial counsel

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 7, 2021)

Attorneys

Sonya Bamberg
Sonya Bamberg — Petitioner