I. D(0M)T UVmA^Cr me jwGe vȣ*fe
f!eNi>?£0 a1* <J.$T ttss^stj c\cxihs <5- ■# tiw TH£
LQteytA 9-oP- CMftAOgrA) 4L G>^ RgSPdAiP^wt
To rm (te<jugS7 Mtrncfe oA M7£AL/B6MD om
/o)^)/9 wiTfouT Aiiawuii^O "77% /77'Z qAaj/&^
<F^ UO&APfeM Kt%/?,67 &L -U f{£Sp<wO Al/PSj ?

5.T5NIT A STuZXPfe PfcSptfAiSlS/UT. ^ 7& H&gtt^emgAJrs 'fte plqiajV/A1 mo Tile
DepBNDft/^r SgFofte- ft AuAwi
Cft^ 7 (I.vioL&Twj 0A "We 'ft ftmeNOroertT?

3 UWCN'T 77 A VtotrWl Op 9ft U.SCV750>» /7.ft
' uiwftftST^ &/*fe IhotAlCK C,V3M/^ <3 7 "7^
11 c. DrSl^lcY CAMfiT Fb/l ZffleAti QmfUCT & v4seS) a ^^7=^- ftsflwfc ^ ,
(ajm^a) M (el4L om Mii.M'toto mWJnu Pficr ms OF Tea U.9. m&Wfi 'B ZuOfefaPfflC
CTOUfiD- QUleQpcfl mM)t 4 KnUKtr /a/Py/'?

if ujANir ?r fl Wwi f&sfu*ao&
HexpUfSTfrO 0V 6? V™'* 0 1

5: PtfiMiT "Xu u% rrn^mre fp°^
g. vcun O- OF Trie US t&hto 36Sc7mLa£ ■too am fbufiT» (umr ^rJ?Jy F%LcdX> A

Whether the U.S. Magistrate Judge violated the petitioner's due process rights by acting like the lawyer for Warden Kiser et al. by responding to the request for notice of appeal/bond on 10/31/19 without allowing the attorney for Warden Kiser et al. to respond first?