No. 20-6543

Curtis Moody v. Chae Harris, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection gerrymandering redistricting standing
Latest Conference: 2021-01-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in affirming the district court's dismissal of petitioners' claims challenging the constitutionality of Ohio's congressional redistricting plan

Docket Entries

2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent Harris, Warden to respond filed.
2020-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2021)

Attorneys

Curtis Moody
Curtis Moody — Petitioner
Harris, Warden
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent