No. 20-6537
Tamara Rouhi v. CVS Pharmacy, et al.
IFP
Tags: appeal appeals-court case-dismissal civil-procedure district-court due-process fraud injustice judicial-misconduct legal-procedure procedural-error standing
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
The Defendants did not make a single factual or valid point, but still prevailed in the case. That is clearly unjust.
I am not happy with the service (in terms of business, but also postage) that I received from the Federal District Court of Maryland or the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
The Federal District Court of Maryland made the wrong decision. The decision was not based on law, but instead, on lies. This injustice should be corrected.
The Federal Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit made a fraudulent judgement. This injustice should be corrected.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-10-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Tamara Rouhi
Tamara Rouhi — Petitioner