No. 20-6536
IFP
Tags: appeal civil-rights conspiracy court-integrity due-process federal-proceedings habeas-corpus judicial-misconduct legal-procedure malicious-prosecution predetermination
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the Respondents conspired to predetermine the outcome of federal proceedings prior to the issuance of arrest warrants
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-08-24
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Florida Attorney General
Vinodh Raghubir
Vinodh Raghubir — Petitioner