No. 20-6530
Jamel Mobley v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-preservation appellate-process constitutional-ineffectiveness fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel new-trial-standard right-to-counsel sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington trial-counsel
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether trial counsel can be constitutionally ineffective under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) for failing to preserve an issue for purposes of appeal when said issue, had it been preserved, would have granted the defendant a new trial and therefore, would have changed the outcome of the proceedings?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trial counsel can be constitutionally ineffective under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) for failing to preserve an issue for purposes of appeal
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-18
Waiver of right of respondents State of Florida to respond filed.
2020-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Jamel Mobley
Rachael Elizabeth Reese — O'Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Petitioner
State of Florida