No. 20-6503
George J. Raudenbush, III v. Monroe County, Tennessee, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights collateral-estoppel due-process false-prosecution in-forma-pauperis ineffective-assistance police-brutality right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Sixth Circuit erred by denying Raudenbush's application to proceed in forma pauperis.
2. Whether the Sixth Circuit erred by finding that Raudenbush's appeal was "frivolous," when he was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate the related criminal defense case.
3. Whether the Sixth Circuit erred by finding that Raudenbush's appeal was "frivolous," when he was denied the right to effective counsel in the underlying criminal defense case.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit erred by denying Raudenbush's application to proceed in forma pauperis
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-13
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-01-25
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-12-10
Waiver of right of respondent Monroe County, TN, Bill Bivens and Travis Jones to respond filed.
2020-12-10
Waiver of right of respondents Town of Tellico Plains, Tennessee and Brian Millsaps to respond filed.
2020-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 4, 2021)
Attorneys
George J. Raudenbush
George J. Raudenbush III — Petitioner
Monroe County, TN, Bill Bivens and Travis Jones
Jonathan Swann Taylor — Taylor & Knight, GP, Respondent
Town of Tellico Plains, Tennessee and Brian Millsaps
Reid A. Spaulding — Watson, Roach, Batson & Lauderback, P.L.C., Respondent