Robert T. Sigler v. Jimmy Thornton, et al.
iMAS £_QLiMTV ^.a\/ERaEMT DE-LlfiH^T^LV Xt\(hUPPH
b^r/UMBS dLfl£s.iMHEM cy) b&rmiAlB&s
SLEPT iM % yC ID. (LEiLL- hEZSJ£>Kldb FOR- CX)jIaI3LTI4 3RD
be_TAJ1M££ SLEBPIAIfi akl FLOOR hhfiTTRESS A l\lhlS&T/U:ME&
AIUKI\ES$*ASLB;&PXW& ALSO OM FLOOR AAATTR&SS jBUT LM/DEA.
EURVK QF b&TAXAIEE l) fEK.VT
IME jS lQUMTV £0\/BRAAEAlT DELXREAATOLV XMbXF^RIAIHEM QMLVXMbOORfc^VT TQWA^S bERAXMEB OLASS,
KELR&ATXOM IAIAS M/AXLXBLE?
LdLiMTY &m/ERAAEMT bELX<B£RATSLV XAiLXPF/S 'R
™"*" sr»sffi "w R0CHE KVT
TXMELV *3B.R\TEh
Urns ftaveiuAKMT ^elibe ^atelw xw^pf^^J rmurtfe^
tsBTimiBaaLdSSjBV alldimxai 6 f n vme&kl/ eh/vm&e
e.L-D.rHXWfi» AUb ClMLY fSi-SHfllAlSRS WlEEkLXf
UlAS (LUSS QF be/rrtXMEECs) hEAUE h &UE PROdSSS
ALL CHI ELAXAAS ABQVE. flfiAlAIST CLQUMTY SQV/eft-XM
i\/\exvVf
Whether the county government was deliberately indifferent towards the detainee class by providing inadequate sleeping conditions, limited recreation time, poor food quality, and limited access to hygiene