No. 20-6480
Maurice Freeman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment bailey-v-united-states detention fourth-amendment immediate-vicinity michigan-v-summers police-authority premises-search probable-cause reasonable-suspicion search-and-seizure search-warrant
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does the rule of Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), which permits police officers executing a search warrant to detain occupants of a residence to be searched without reasonable suspicion or probable cause of criminal activity, extend to individuals on a public street near the residence?
2. What does the term "immediate vicinity" mean, as used in Bailey v. United States, 568 U.S. 186 (2013), in which this Court said, "[t]he categorical authority to detain incident to the execution of a search warrant must be limited to the immediate vicinity of the premises to be searched."
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the rule of Michigan v. Summers extend to individuals on a public street near the residence?
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Maurice Freeman
Becky Kurz — Federal Public Defender Office, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent