I.
Whether the reasoning of Lee v. United States, 137
S. Ct. 1958 (2017) extends to defendants facing
lifelong sex offender registration conditions from a
conviction and therefore prevents a court from
summarily denying a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a finding of lack of prejudice resulting from a defendant's decision not to
go to trial that was based entirely on their lawyer's
incorrect advice that the sole defense to the
charges would not be available at trial.

II.
Whether a defendant must prove the existence of
a plea offer to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing
on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel arising out of his counsel's failure to attempt plea negotiations.

Whether the reasoning of Lee v. United States extends to defendants facing lifelong sex offender registration conditions