Whether the "statute of conviction" must be used for an ACC A predicate offense, or can the district court use the statute listed on the indictment instead?

Whether, in light of Stitt, Ohio aggravated burglary is broader than the generic burglary definition under the ACCA's enumerated offense clause?

Does the doctrine of Collateral Estoppel prevent the government and district court from reversing position on an issue of law after holding a contrary position in an earlier proceeding within the same case?

Whether the statute of conviction must be used for an ACCA predicate offense, or can the district court use the statute listed on the indictment instead?