No. 20-6457
Phillip Watkins v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process hybrid-representation pro-se right-to-counsel sixth-circuit standing supplemental-brief
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Petitioner, after presenting trial court motion in an alternative court action in an amended (Amend.) black letter brief presented Pro Se by Petitioner, allow him to submit Pro Se Supplemental to file CAP. 3*) prior to Superior Court affidavit?
2. Whether Petitioner's motion in alternative CO Li presented trial court motion in an alternative court action in an amended brief, allow appellant filed brief Pro Se, and if trial court motion affected appeal?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appellate court erred in denying the appellant's motion to dismiss court-appointed counsel and allow him to submit pro se supplemental briefing
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)
Attorneys
Phillip Watkins
Phillip Watkins — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent