1. Don't the complete reversals affirm that malicious prosecution, inter alia, occurred and therefore requires, on the law, that the case be remanded for a jury trial for compensation? This 42 USC § 1983 complaint was timely and competently litigated. No right was given up in any pre or post-trial processes.

2. Doesn't the overall pattern of institutionalized abuse by the defendants against victims of 9/11 terrorism — easily surpass federal thresholds of "habit and custom" sufficient to name the Municipality of Greene County as a defendant?

3. Trial records show that Greene County Deputy Rowell knowingly created a false and malicious arrest on February 14, 2010, which ADA Charles Bucca prosecuted, conviction, and all other convictions, are reversed on appeal. Doesn't this alone allow the claim to move to a jury for award determination?

Whether the complete reversals of the convictions affirm that malicious prosecution occurred, requiring the case to be remanded for a jury trial for compensation