No. 20-6367
Kissinger St. Fleur v. United States
IFP
Tags: appellate-review buyer-seller-transaction cocaine-distribution conspiracy criminal-conspiracy criminal-procedure drug-crimes due-process fair-trial judicial-discretion jury-instruction jury-instructions
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the district court and the Eleventh Circuit deny Mr. St. Fleur a fair trial when it failed to give buyer-seller instructions to the jury?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court and the Eleventh Circuit deny Mr. St. Fleur a fair trial when it failed to give buyer-seller instructions to the jury?
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-18
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-01-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 19, 2021.
2021-01-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 19, 2021 to February 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 19, 2021.
2020-12-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 18, 2020 to January 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2020)
Attorneys
Kissinger St. Fleur
Charles Michael Greene — Law Office of Charles M. Greene, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent