We EK Pino po ted
ns oe United StotesCourt_of AP Peal ancl Micelle Dis tira to
Sok Elena has oleseteal So Fixe Reale the accebhed andl
use| course _of judicial _weview of 0 hetero Mi. Coober
~ BOG S186 = Missouri MW Frye clatmn this ems
——-peamviage of justice

Question et
tse Fective_assistenceoFcounsel slate olisputes, does_-_
—___the_weight ofthe evicleuce ge. toDefendant= Petitioner if. the.
_ VE. como tevec| thatcounsel lite dabout_a_matenta. |__issue_e ce
—— EXP ination for. Ques hon 3 2m . ee

_fetition ex—Fileot_ Motonto.be.atboiuteol Counsel Due elevrol
hn ob. because —_he "felt he_was_unableto_ovencome—the olf
ac thy OF the Andi eseriisim Fife ctive.Decilth Penalty Act oF 2
4m Wthen Mees esting argumeuts.,.The US. Disteret Coumt..——
oleic nl_ Petitioners Motion fre oPMoinhment of Counsel_(dec.3).
So Pethionen mone! foe the Bro Se liberally Constee Protec.
+E Hom, but the Distiet Count olented We Se Motectionssteting.-——
the AE DPA_..0mexPlaineet. how. the
ce wiou! A_tundevimine.the—lece lity..0fhis—comuichion ool Seu —
tone (Doe HB, Py 29) Arch the Ltn Chrceuit helely ae
a2 Dawiissclaim was Factally insufficient CAP Rem cli Xs Ay Pn tt 2 oe

Wi Question se Qo
Desa Pio Se_hthevelly Conshare lacteine reguest Protect.
SQ ences tiated legal ohily ono (AED PA) review 2 ———

— ___ LE yPi ination _Fox_Questiow st QA ee eect
ane Seen wus .col__to File nig
——-—--.--.claiwi_came Brom the U.8,—Discoiet Couwh, amd Sober You _
-—o_not _neea to cite law Ab ienal!X =F).

aa Questo 2 Ann
Can the U8. Dishsict Count cleny Petitionen Relic because —

neditd not cite law because. forms instructions) steteol

AE xP linatton For Queshien se 3
oo Pot ht fonew ts claim ond.the evielenceintheRecowe Ere
—— Gre usacdOn.enS hhow.es that h is_couuse! _entevecl_c oumtveawsoned
Lim awed Fee iuny teal, eventhough the Mroseci tan oF

Whether the weight of the evidence supports the defendant-petitioner's claim that counsel lied about a material issue, resulting in ineffective assistance of counsel