(1) LE tA Gasirvpvte Violv bord ok Dut Paces f, ,
tke govenneobs TPosecu fot AS pgeok, va LIE non
A veo d yor, MATA BUIQEN CE Kartwed 4h perjoredy & ohh
an 9 eco ? Katou é Rapscbly subotr) payery@) Is it A Viol ho) oF He J* Aros duewt ty ,
Us - Ip ale Juontt ie 'pba bh Ophe " > hy A Wry
fe sonnck, ¢ Sertone ? Kaas oy papell Su hoje) Org Y) hues.

(3) Is id 4A Sith Are docurt Vahhns Fe AK lee
JNSPWICTS Appeleh Gust A fh SSve Or @ anf
Ey wr choc, DS Nol Syeludait iS 4A) Ag — a Dy Jar Weta ase SIVES ,
' roce dural defer Hr! CJ " sy ast
@ p d Ks A enc error' 7 (hy 6" perpen AeP 4
an wipro or WD (thee, Post Gio he "yates.

Whether the government's prosecution for a speech act violated the First Amendment's free speech protections