No. 20-6345
Thomas Reid DeCarlo v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights congressional-power constitutional-interpretation constitutional-supremacy due-process federal-constitution judicial-review legislative-acts legislative-process separation-of-powers
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Congress can override the Federal Constitution
Docket Entries
2022-06-27
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-06-07
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2021-06-01
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2021-01-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Thomas Reid DeCarlo
Thomas Reid DeCarlo — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Respondent