WHETHER OR NOT THE LOWER COURT ERRED AND ABUSED HIS DISCRETION THE TRIAL COURT REVERSIBLY ERRED FOR ALLOWING "VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT AND VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE" OVER OBJECTION DURING GUILT/INNOCENCE PHASE OF TRIAL.

2. WHETHER OR NOT THE LOWER COURT ERRED AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN NOT FINDING THE ISSUANCE OF AN "AFFIRMATIVE FINDING" OF A "DEADLY WEAPON" SHOULD HAVE BEEN OMITTED FROM JUDGMENT.

3. WHETHER OR NOT THE LOWER COURT ERRED AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN NOT DETERMINING THE SENTENCES WERE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL IN COMPARISON TO OTHER DEFENDANTS SIMILARLY SITUATED.

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims