Krystal Megan Delima v. Walmart Stores Arkansas, LLC
1. Whether a Motion for a New Trial, FRCP Rule 59, should had been granted?
2. Whether Jury 's Verdict, went against Preponderance of Evidence due the Irregularities of the Proceeding wherein Substantial Evidences/ facts have been unfairly reviewed due to Miscarriage of Justice?
3. Whether the U.S. Supreme Court, conduct a thorough and fair examination and evaluation as the laws apply and review the damages and penalty in the justification this case. Amendment XIV, states that, "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Whether a Motion for a New Trial, FRCP Rule 59, should had been granted?