No. 20-6324
Michael Christopher Laird v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process judicial-review mental-competency mental-deficiencies post-conviction post-conviction-proceedings procedural-fairness real-and-substantial-doubt
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
WAS PETITIONER DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS BECAUSE THE DISTRICT COURT FAILED TO ADDRESS, DURING POST-CONVICTION PROCEEDINGS, PETITIONER'S COMPETENCY CLAIM BASED ON HIS VERIFIED SEVERE MENTAL DEFICIENCIES WHICH RAISE SUFFICIENT FACTS TO CREATE A REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT AS TO HIS COMPETENCY?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner denied his constitutional right to due process?
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Michael Laird
Daniel Donovan — Daniel Donovan PC, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent