1. Did the Courts erred in the opinion that petitioners DELEON WAS dismissed Muary unauthorized And successive, And denied relief oof ACEGABAL qpeuids A 3 dismissed without Medics 2

2. Did the Courts Rceédlioo Resulted WA decision that_was bssed of Al Thnineasows dehettwol ctacks thd inwehes Asi! oi Sacks diBigect Ren oat of the cast nich the Awielple Wao Announced?

3. NTatal Court mainWWin A comvtetions where pethonen was Whe sf eprint ok _ComRechons aK Has Ye in Question ? ,

4. Wal Counsel Render 'NeHective Assishnce oF counse) when he = Pape badd thal ns alia te the Adana Fag) tig Ny coRfuatiok af the \auth geeks cHar_ok dhs 4Ra | ROCESS, 7

5. (Did +nial counsel denied jeitionsts his Right_4y call dll_ot his | i winesses AY deta Da evidence \whts wor?

6. Did Fan) fous) ented in vnlitag petitionsns Eh aenednend due ia double Seapancy of Multiple tenses withis oe dime ented?

7. Lidia the Crcust Court fea the (ily of Yamphn enred oy actusin elitionea fo'ttoduce ato evidence Adocumest tht ventty ALL iNeaRcezated _ fate ssa. nns ance abe et ocd _

Whether the petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated due to trial counsel's conduct involving dishonesty that tainted the entire trial process