Donna Raively v. Thomas A. Whelihan
1. Whether an attorney is held to a certain standard of fiduciary duty in lower courts; his knowledge of the law far exceeds that of the average person. They are entrusted with personal information of their client and should be trustworthy. When an attorney takes advantage of his fiduciary duty and not only violates his clients contract but also his fmst, who will stop him if the court system fails to do so?
2. Whether or not an attorney is working on a different case for his client is it in his clients best interest to have a custody case with a mentally challeged adult heard with an estate case?
3. Was it inadequate discovery or procrastination that caused an attorney to not reveal crucial case not benefidary of? m3ny h°UrS W6re biHeCl t0 the c,lent seekjng mone Y from an I R A. that they were
Whether an attorney is held to a certain standard of fiduciary-duty,attorney-misconduct,client-trust,legal-ethics,civil-procedure,standing