No. 20-6279
Bodhisattva Skandha v. Superior Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex County, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure court-discretion due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel full-faith-and-credit full-faith-credit ineffective-assistance judicial-procedure mental-condition standing standing-doctrine
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT?
WHETHER THE PLAINTIFF HAS STANDING ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT?
WHETHER THE LOWER COURT FAILED TO APPLY FULL FAITH AND CREDIT?
WHETHER THE RPOI WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?
WHETHER THE DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO AN ADJUDICATION TO DETERMINE HIS MENTAL CONDITION AFTER JUDGE KANE'S COMMITMENT ORDER ON FEBRUARY 25, 1992?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court abused its discretion by dismissing the complaint?
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Bodhisattva Skandha
Bodhisattva Skandha — Petitioner