No. 20-6278

Bodhisattva Skandha v. Gloriann Moroney

Lower Court: Massachusetts
Docketed: 2020-11-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion application-of-law attorney-general civil-procedure claim court-discretion facts false-statements fraud jurisdiction legal-procedure official-document parole-board representation standing supreme-court tort tort-claim Whether making false statements in an official doc Whether the defendant is allowed to represent the Whether the respondent was required to apply the l
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-01-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

Issue #1: WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY NOT ALLOWING THE TORT CLAIM TO GO FORWARD?

Issue #2: WHETHER MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS IN AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES FRAUD?

Issue #3: WHETHER THE DEFENDANT IS ALLOWED TO REPRESENT THE PAROLE BOARD WHERE SHE IS NOT AN ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL?

Issue #4: WHETHER THE RESPONDENT WAS REQUIRED TO APPLY THE LAW TO THE FACTS, AS DELINEATED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court abused its discretion by not allowing the tort claim to go forward?

Docket Entries

2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Bodhisattva Skandha
Bodhisattva Skandha — Petitioner