Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER MANDAMUS IS APPROPRIATE TO COMPEL A DISTRICT COURT TO EXTEND THE TIMELINESS OF AN APPEAL OF A 3582(c)(2) MOTION FOR AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS BASED ON EXCUSABLE NEGLECT, WHERE THE PETITIONER DID NOT RECEIVE THE COURT'S FINAL JUDGMENT UNTIL 32 DAYS AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE APPEAL PERIOD, BUT PROMPTLY FILED A MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-20
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Attorneys
In Re Derrick Howell
Derrick Howell — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent