1. Question in reviewing the merits of Rule 60(b)(6). Motion is whether the unique fact of Petitioner's case reveal extraordinary circumstances justifying relief from the Habeas sJudgment. The answer to this question is "Yes"

2. Why if Appeal Courts have an inherent power to correct earlier error, if it becomes apparent and avoid injustice.

3. In this instant case, does Buck, Tharpe and Apprendi, Haymond reauire this Court to Remand with instruction to allow the Rule (b) as timely filed. 60

Whether the unique facts of Petitioner's case reveal extraordinary circumstances justifying relief from the Habeas Judgment under Rule 60(b)(6)