No. 20-6261
Damien Edward Desjardins-Racine v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process extraordinary-and-compelling-reasons first-step-act guidelines sentencing
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does Asthnu Diagnosis o A OF Give − Rise EXTZADRDINATY OTD .3F TO AN compelling REASON DURSUANT the SeNtercing GUiDeliNeS?
DD The Rassabe oF oyf FIRST STEP ACT BIND The COUNT ON DISCRETION DISTRICT GND USED TO DETERMiNe EXTAONDINATY ASSENT a compelling UPPATED PeTiNEN ReasoNs
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a DGQM0VS OP Astin give rise to an extraordinary and compelling reasons pursuant to [1423] of the Sentencing Guidelines?
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Damien Edward Desjardins-Racine
Damien Edward Desjardins-Racine — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent