THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR, CONTRARY TO 42 U.S.C. §2000cc et seq., WHEN IT ABDICATED THE RESPONSIBILITY, CONFERRED BY CONGRESS ON THE COURTS, TO APPLY THE RELIGIOUS LAND USE AND INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS ACT'S RIGOROUS TEST TO A PRISON POLICY THAT SUBSTANTIALLY BURDENS A MUSLIM'S SINCERE BELIEF THAT PRAYER OIL IS REQUIRED 5 TIMES DAILY ACCORDING TO ISLAM.

Whether the Sixth Circuit committed plain error, contrary to 42 U.S.C. §2000cc et seq., when it abdicated the responsibility, conferred by Congress on the courts, to apply the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act's rigorous test to a prison policy that substantially burdens a Muslim's sincere belief that prayer oil is required 5 times daily according to Islam