T. WHERE PETITIONER'S SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS GUARANTEED UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AS WELL AS MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION OF 1963, ART.I, §20 DENIED, WHERE THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY FAILING TO HEAR PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF APPELLATE COUNSEL?

2. WHERE PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT GUARANTEED UNDER THE U.5. CONSTITUTION DENIED, WHERE THE TRIAL COURT REFUSED TO ADJOURN HIS CASE ONCE NEW COUNSEL WAS RETAINED?

3. WHERE PETITIONER'S SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS GUARANTEED UNDER U.5. CONSTITUTION, TO A FAIR TRIAL AND DUE PROCESS DENIED, WHERE THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION, WHEN ENDORSING A LATE WITNESS AND DENYING PETITIONER AN ADJOURNMENT TO PREPARE AN EFFECTIVE CROSS EXAMINATION?

4. WHERE PETITIONER'S SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, AND MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION OF 1 963, ART.1,§17, DENIED, WHERE THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN MOTION FOR PETITIONER'S DENYING DISQUALIFICATION/RECUSAL?

5. WHERE PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT GUARANTEED UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL DENIED, WHERE COUNSEL FAILED TO INVESTIGATE SEVERAL ASPECTS OF THE CASE, AND INSTEAD, RELIED ON GOVERNMENT'S GOOD FAITH EFFORTS, WHICH IS CONTRARY TO STRICKLAND V WASHINGTON, AND ITS PROGENY?

6. WHERE PETITIONER'S SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS GUARANTEED UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL DENIED, WHERE COUNSEL DENIED PETITIONER A MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT A COMPLETE DEFENSE?

6.(A) WHERE PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT GUARANTEED UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE TO TRIAL COUNSEL DENIED, WHERE COUNSEL REFUSED TO CONDUCT A MEANINGFUL CONSULTATION WITH PETITIONER?

6. (B) WHERE . PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT GUARANTEED UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE TO TRIAL COUNSEL DENIED, WHERE COUNSEL REFUSED TO CONDUCT A MEANINGFUL INVESTIGATION, TO WIT, WITNESSES CRIMINAL HISTORY, WHICH WAS MATERIAL TO THE CASE?

6.(0 WHERE PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT GUARANTEED UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL DENIED, WHERE COUNSEL FAILED TO INVESTIGATE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL KEY WITNESS (OAIL HOUSE WITNESS)?

6-(D) WHERE PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT GUARANTEED UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL DENIED, WHERE COUNSEL WAS INFIRM IN CROSS EXAMINING PROSECUTION WITNESSES?

6. (E) WHERE PETITIONER '5 SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT GUARANTEED UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL DENIED, WHERE COUNSEL FAILED TO OBDECT TO CONES TESTIMONY?

6.(F) WHERE PETITIONER

Denial of Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights