No. 20-6244
Thomas M. Ha v. Christine Popoff, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation cross-examination due-process morrissey-precedent morrissey-v-brewer parole parolee-rights revocation-hearing witness-confrontation
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the holding in Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972), that a parolee's due process right to confront and cross-examine an adverse witness must be triggered by a request, is limited to preliminary hearings or, instead, extends to revocation hearings.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the holding in Morrissey v. Brewer extends to revocation hearings
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent Christine Popoff to respond filed.
2020-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Christine Popoff
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Thomas Ha
Oliver Loewy — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner